Continued from page 1
Let’s lay out
advantages and
disadvantages for them clearly. And, yes, tell them about
disadvantages as well as
advantages. By doing so, we’ll increase our credibility. We might even learn something by writing
advantages on one side of a page and
disadvantages on
other.
After we’ve made our case, we’ll try to stimulate feedback. Try to get a sense of how our message was received and what response it got. Did they respond
way we expected? Did a consensus begin to emerge?
If not, we need to start
process over again, with a new diagnosis. And, we’ll basically reiterate
process. But, this time, put even more time into, and emphasis on, their assumptions and expectations. If
process doesn’t work, it’s because they didn’t find enough benefits in our earlier communication.
In
end, consensus is always about them. And, to get them to go along with our plans for change, we need to be as conscious of their needs as we are of our own.
Summarizing, think of consensus as
end point of a process, rather than something we can immediately organize. That process starts with analysis and listening, then responds to what we heard in
listening phase.
Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott's Communication Letter. Learn how you can use communication to help achieve your goals, by reading articles or by subscribing to this newsletter. An excellent resource for leaders and managers, at: http://www.communication-newsletter.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a325e/a325e50b25ac0e7ae6f1b43223ab8214c39dd303" alt=""
Robert F. Abbott writes and publishes Abbott’s Communication Letter. Learn how you can use communication to help achieve your goals, by reading articles or subscribing to this ad-supported newsletter. An excellent resource for leaders and managers, at: http://www.communication-newsletter.com